Chinese Journal of Blood Purification ›› 2024, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (03): 227-231.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2024.03.016

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Construction of a risk prediction model for catheter-related infection and treatment strategies of the infection in maintenance hemodialysis patients

XIONG Yuan-yuan, ZHONG Fang-ping, PENG Ai-ping, WANG Li, HU Ming-liang   

  1. Department of Nephrology, People’s Hospital  of Longhua District, Guangdong, Shenzhen 518110, China
  • Received:2023-08-31 Revised:2023-11-19 Online:2024-03-12 Published:2024-03-12
  • Contact: 518110 深圳,1深圳市龙华区人民医院肾内科 E-mail:2604577148@ qq.com

Abstract: Objective   To investigate the influencing factors for catheter-associated infection (CRBSI), to construct a prediction model, and to build up treatment strategies of the injection in patients with maintenance hemodialysis (MHD).  Methods   A total of 204 MHD patients in our hospital were selected as the control subjects. They were divided into infected group (n=63) and non-infected group (n=141). Logistic regression was used to analyze the patients’ clinical data and to construct the model. A new intervention system was then established based on the model, clinical experience and literature reports. In addition, a total of 198 MHD patients were selected as the observation subjects to evaluate the effects of the new intervention system.  Results Diabetes history (OR=2.237, 95% CI: 1.067~5.679, P=0.003), catheter placement time (OR=3.647, 95% CI: 1.326~7.892, P=0.024), frequency of catheter care (OR=6.679, 95% CI: 2.534~16.476, P=0.003), aseptic training rate (OR=2.889, 95% CI: 1.146~6.654, P=0.030) and blood uric acid (OR=2.937, 95% CI: 1.627~8.883, P=0.014) were the independent influencing factors for CRBSI in MHD patients. The model equation was Y=-20.673+1.116×blood uric acid+1.012×aseptic training rate+2.017×catheter care frequency+1.912×catheterization time+1.079×diabetes history. Hosmer and Lemeshow's goodness of fit test equation was used (χ2=10.678, P=0.236). Receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the area under the curve was 0.813, the sensitivity was 89.47%, and the specificity was 63.93%. The incidence of CRBSI and adverse events were lower in the observation group than those in the control group (χ2=3.606 and 32.780; P <0.001).  Conclusion  The prediction model has a better discrimination validity, and the evidence-based systematic nursing intervention system has a better effect on preventing and controlling CRBSI in MHD patients.

Key words: Maintenance hemodialysis, Evidence-based, Catheter-associated infection, Prediction model, Nursing countermeasure

CLC Number: