中国科技核心期刊
中国科技论文统计源期刊
中文生物医学期刊文献数据库
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD收录)
中国学术期刊综合评价数据库统计源期刊
《中国学术期刊影响因子年报》统计源期刊
Chinese Journal of Blood Purification ›› 2020, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (09): 602-605.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2020.09.007
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
Revised:
Online:
Published:
Contact:
Abstract: 【Abstract】Objective To explore the effects of microbiological preparations on inflammation and uremic toxins among hemodialysis patients. Methods We searched CNKI, CBM, WanFang Data, VIP, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, from inception to February 2019 to collect the related literature. RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. Results A total of 10 articles involving 481 cases were included. Meta-analysis showed that the reduction of P-cresyl sulfate (PCS) was different between microbial preparations group and placebo group, with the mean differences (MDs) of -0.71 (95% CI -1.37~-0.06, P= 0.030). There were no significant changes in indoxyl sulfate (IS), CRP, urea and creatinine between the two groups, withMDs of -0.38 (95% CI -0.98~ 0.22, P=0.220) for IS,MDs of -1.49 (95% CI-8.00~5.01, P=0.650) for CRP, MDs of 1.48 (95% CI - 3.79~ 6.75, P=0.580) for urea, and MDs of - 0.15 (95% CI - 1.21~0.92, P=0.790) for creatinine. Conclusion Prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics may have an effect on hemodialysis patients. However, more rigorous design, large scale, multi-center and randomized controlled clinical trials are needed to verify the study.
Key words: Probiotics, Synbiotics, Prebiotics, Hemodialysis, Urea toxin, Meta-analysis
CLC Number:
R453
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
URL: https://www.cjbp.org.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2020.09.007
https://www.cjbp.org.cn/EN/Y2020/V19/I09/602