Chinese Journal of Blood Purification ›› 2025, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (06): 524-528.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2025.06.017

Previous Articles    

A systematic review of the models for predicting frailty risk in maintenance hemodialysis patients

ZHOU Jin-feng, ZHAO Li, LUO Wen-yu, QIU Ling-yu, FAN Yi-xi, ZENG Hao-jie   

  1. Department of Nursing, The Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, China; 2North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, China; 3Department of Nursing, Sichuan Orthopedic Hospital, Chengdu 610041, China; 4Department of Nursing, Panzhihua Central Hospital, Panzhihua 617000, China
  • Received:2024-08-01 Revised:2025-03-03 Online:2025-06-12 Published:2025-05-29
  • Contact: 637000 南充,1川北医学院附属医院护理部; 637000 南充,2川北医学院护理学院 E-mail:545667952@qq.com

Abstract: Objective  To systematically search and evaluate the frailty risk prediction models for maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients.  Methods  The relevant literatures on frailty risk prediction models for MHD patients published on Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, Wipnet, Wanfang and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database were systematically searched. The search period is up to May 1, 2024. Two researchers independently screened the literatures according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, evaluated model performance and quality of the literatures.  Results  A total of 16 studies with 18 models were included. Six studies conducted internal validation, one conducted external validation, and one conducted a combination of internal and external validation. The differentiation of 15 studies was >0.7. Models applicability is generally good, but the risk of overall bias is high, and mainly concentrated in the field of statistical analysis. The predictors of frequency ≥5 were age, comorbidities, albumin, sex, nutrition and sports training.  Conclusion  Most of the existing frailty risk prediction models for MHD patients have methodological defects and higher bias. In the future, frailty risk prediction models should be constructed and verified internally and externally on the basis of standardized research design and reporting procedures.

Key words: Maintenance hemodialysis, Frailty, Prediction model, Systematic evaluation

CLC Number: