|
The clinical value of ultrasonography measurement for autologous arteriovenous fistula on the estimation of urea clearance index in hemodialysis patients
2018, 17 (06):
391-396.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2018.06.008
【Abstract】Objectives To study the measurement of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) by ultrasonography for the estimation of AVF maturation and hemodialysis (HD) adequacy. Methods HD patients with forearm AVF in the 8 HD centers were enrolled into this cross-sectional study. AVFs were measured by ultrasonography to obtain the parameters of diameter (D), systolic peak flow velocity (SPV), end-diastolic flow velocity (EDV) and blood flow volume (BFV) at the sites of end segment of brachial artery (a1), beginning segments of radial artery (a2) and ulnar artery (a3), upper segment of radial artery before anastomotic stoma (a4) and segment of cephalic vein near the blood access suite (a5). Urea clearance index (Kt/V) was measured in one stable HD session in the middle of a week. An AVF with D-a5 ≥0.5cm and BFV-a5>500ml/min was regarded as a maturated AVF. The adequacy of HD was identified as Kt/V ≥1.2. Logistic regression was done to analyze the parameters affecting maturation of AVF and the rate of compliance with the target Kt/V value. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was performed to estimate the rate of compliance with the target Kt/V value based on the formula from logistic regression analyses. Patients were then divided into 3 groups according to maturation of AVF and compliance with the target Kt/V value, group one with maturated AVF and compliance with the target Kt/V value, group 2 with maturated AVF and without compliance with the target Kt/V value, and group 3 without maturated AVF but with compliance with the target Kt/V value. The parameters were compared among the three groups. Results A total of 324 patients were enrolled in this study, including 223 patients (68.83%) with maturated AVFs and 310 patients (95.68%) with Kt/V compliant with the target level. The independent correlation parameter for AVF maturation was D-a2 (RR=5.779, OR=0.003, P=0.003). The independent correlation parameters for Kt/V compliant with the target level were body weight (RR=-0.057, OR=1.059, P=0.000), diabetes (RR=0.983, OR=0.374, P=0.035) and D-a5 (RR=6.137, OR=0.002, P=0.000). The area under the curve to estimate the rate of compliance with target Kt/V value based on the formula from logistic regression was 0.849 (P=0.000, 95% CI 0.784~0.914). There were 209 patients (64.5%) in group one, 14 patients (4.3%) in group 2 and 101 patients (31.2%) in group 3. Compared to the other two groups, patients in group 2 had more diabetes patients (78.6% vs. 40.2%, χ2=15.234, P=0.000, compared to group one; 78.6% vs. 35.6%, χ2=84.236, P=0.000, compared to group 3), higher height [(173.64±8.35)cm vs. (167.37±7.86)cm, P=0.003, 95% CI 2.15~10.39, compared to group one; (173.64±8.35)cm vs. (166.10±6.89)cm, P=0.001, 95% CI 3.29~11.80, compared to group 3), heavier weight [(85.04±22.19)kg vs. (66.63±10.72)kg, P=0.000, 95% CI -24.88~11.93, compared to group one; (85.04±22.19)kg vs. (65.31±12.37)kg, P=0.000, 95% CI - 26.41~13.03, compared to group 3), and lower Kt/V [(1.04±0.13) vs. (1.31±0.28), P=0.000, 95% CI 0.12~0.42, compare to group one; (1.04±0.13) vs. (1.29±0.27), P=0.001, 95% CI 0.101~0.406, compared to group 3]. Compared to group one, patients in group 3 had less values of D-a1, D-s2, D-a3 and D-a4 [(0.54± 0.11)cm vs. (0.61±0.13)cm, P=0.000, 95% CI -0.063~0.072 for D-a1; (0.41±0.10)cm vs. (0.48±0.13)cm, P=0.000, 95% CI -0.062~0.016 for D-a2; (0.41±0.09)cm vs. (0.46±0.11)cm, P=0.000, 95% CI -0.071~-0.021 for D- a3; (0.31 ± 0.08)cm vs. (0.35 ± 0.10)cm, P=0.001, 95% CI - 0.062~- 0.016 for D- a4], lower SPV- a1 [(112.01 ± 48.70)cm/s vs. (129.45±48.12)cm/s, P=0.003, 95% CI -28.78~6.097) and lower EDV- a1 (55.34±31.20)cm/s vs. (69.08±43.19)cm/s, P=0.004, 95% CI -23.050~-4.415]. Compared to groups one and 2, patients in group 3 had less value of D-a5 [(0.46±0.15)cm vs. (0.75±0.31)cm, P=0.000, 95% CI -0.349~-0.221, compared to group one; 0.46 ± 0.15cm vs. (0.63 ± 0.26)cm, P=0.037, 95% CI - 0.311~- 0.010, compared to groups 2] and less BFV- a5 [(587.67±413.08)ml/min vs. (2,039.28±1,550.72)ml/min, P=0.000, 95% CI - 1, 762.72~1,140.502, compared to group one; 587.67±413.08ml/min vs. 1,695.37±401.58ml/min, P=0.003, 95% CI -1,839.843~-375.571, compared to group 2]. Conclusion Maturation of AVF can be assessed by ultrasonography measurement. The value of D-a2 is an independent factor for AVF maturation. Logistic formula including D- a5, body weight and diabetes can be used to estimate Kt/V in a HD ssession. There exists unmatched situation between AVF maturation and compliance with target Kt/V value.
Metrics
|