中国科技核心期刊
中国科技论文统计源期刊
中文生物医学期刊文献数据库
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD收录)
中国学术期刊综合评价数据库统计源期刊
《中国学术期刊影响因子年报》统计源期刊
Chinese Journal of Blood Purification ›› 2016, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (08): 430-432.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2016.08.013
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
Revised:
Online:
Published:
Abstract: Objective To retrospectively compare the vascular access between diabetic and non-diabetic maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients in a center in Shanghai. Method We compared the type and function of vascular access between diabetic and non- diabetic MHD patients treated in Yangpu Hospital in 2015. The complications relating to blood access were recorded as well. Result We recruited 188 MHD patients including 116 non-diabetic MHD patients and 72 diabetic MHD patients for this investigation. Temporary catheter was used in most diabetic and non-diabetic patients for the first hemodialysis, and fistula was used more in non-diabetic patients than in diabetic patients for the first hemodialysis. The blood flow volume was the same between non-diabetic and diabetic patients. The prevalence of infection, thrombosis and stenosis relating to vascular access was higher in diabetic patients than in non-diabetic patients. Conclusion Most patients used temporary catheters at the beginning of hemodialysis. More diabetic patients used long-term catheters as the permanent vascular access than non-diabetic patients in our center. The prevalence of complications relating to vascular access was higher in diabetic patients than in non-diabetic patients.
Key words: Diabetes, Vascular access, Complication
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
URL: https://www.cjbp.org.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2016.08.013
https://www.cjbp.org.cn/EN/Y2016/V15/I08/430