Chinese Journal of Blood Purification ›› 2021, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (02): 99-106.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2021.02.007

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Efficacy and safety of HIF proly hydroxylase inhibitors vs. erythropoiesis- stimulating agents in the treatment of renal anemia in dialysis patients: a meta analysis 

  

  1. 1College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China;  2Department of Traditional Chinese Nedicine The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
  • Received:2020-10-10 Revised:2020-11-03 Online:2021-02-12 Published:2021-02-23
  • Contact: Shengyun N/ASun E-mail:gzssy@163.com

Abstract: 【Abstract】Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors(HIF-PHIs) and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in the treatment of renal anemia in dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients by meta-analysis. Methods We searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library from inception until 15th September, 2020 for randomized controlled trials of HIF-PHIs and ESAs for the treatment of renal anemia in dialysis-dependent CKD patients. Their hemoglobin(Hb) level, iron metabolism parameters and adverse reactions were extracted and analyzed by the
software of Review Manager Version 5.3. Results Eight studies comprising a total of 1,512 dialysis-dependent CKD patients with anemia were included in the analysis. No significant differences were found between HIF-PHIs group and ESAs group in terms of hemoglobin level (MD=-0.15, 95% CI: -0.35, 0.05; P=0.14), ferritin level (MD=14.61, 95% CI: -3.80, 33.02, P=0.12) and hepcidin level (MD=-16.46, 95% CI: -37.77, 4.85; P=0.13). However, HIF-PHIs group showed better efficacies in terms of transferrin level (MD=0.27, 95% CI: 0.08, 0.46; P=0.02), serum iron level (MD=3.29, 95% CI: 1.22, 5.37; P<0.01) and transferrin saturation
(MD=4.15, 95% CI: 3.88, 4.42; P<0.01) as compared with those in ESAs group. There were no differences in adverse reactions between the two groups (OR=1.31, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.74; P=0.06), except the higher nausea rate (OR=1.85, 95% CI: 1.05, 3.27; P=0.03) in HIF-PHIs group than in ESAs group. Conclusion The meta analysis found that the effect and safety of HIF-PHIs were similar to those of ESAs in the treatment of renal anemia in dialysis-dependent CKD patients.

Key words: Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent, Dialysis-dependent, Anemia, Meta-analysis

CLC Number: