中国科技核心期刊
中国科技论文统计源期刊
中文生物医学期刊文献数据库
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD收录)
中国学术期刊综合评价数据库统计源期刊
《中国学术期刊影响因子年报》统计源期刊
Chinese Journal of Blood Purification ›› 2025, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (04): 313-316.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2025.04.012
Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Hai-yan, GENG Xing-hua, REN Wen-wen, ZHAO Na-xin, XIANG Pan
Received:
Revised:
Online:
Published:
Contact:
Abstract: Objective To observe the effect, complication and patient’s tolerance to remove tunnel-cuffed catheter without incision, in order to find out a catheter withdrawal method more suitable for hemodialysis patients. Method A total of 19 patients undergoing routine hemodialysis from March 2021 to July 2024 at the Blood Purification Center, Department of Nephrology, Beijing Ditan Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University were recruited as the experimental group. They were treated with non-invasive method to remove the tunnel-cuffed catheter (direct and blunt separation at the tunnel opening). A total of 20 patients were recruited as the control group; their tunnel-cuffed catheters were removed by traditional cuff separation after incision. Patients’ baseline data were collected. Result There were 19 patients in the experimental group, with an average surgical time of 7.95±1.00 minutes, intraoperative blood loss of 1.74±0.17ml, lidocaine hydrochloride dosage of 2.79±0.21ml, and pain tolerance score of 1.96±0.32 points. There were 20 patients in the control group, with an average surgical time of 27.00±2.29 minutes, intraoperative blood loss of 5.05±0.32ml, lidocaine hydrochloride dosage of 5.15±0.44ml, and tolerance pain score of 5.40±0.34. All of the indicators were statistically better in experimental group than in control group (average surgical time: χ2=7.014, P<0.001; intraoperative bleeding: χ2=9.160, P<0.001; lidocaine hydrochloride dosage: χ2=4.867, P<0.001; tolerance pain score: χ2=7.341, P<0.001). There were no statistical differences in age, gender, dialysis age, catheter indwelling time, reason for catheter removal, occurrence of bleeding and/or hematoma, and postoperative infection between the two groups (age: χ2=0.147, P=0.884; gender: t=0.445, P=0.946; dialysis age: χ2=0.766, P=4.48; catheter indwelling time: χ2=0.729, P=0.470; reason for catheter removal: t=0.174, P=0.676; occurrence of bleeding and/or hematoma: t=1.004, P=3.16). Conclusion The non-incision method to remove tunnel-cuffed catheters can shorten the operation time, reduce the amount of bleeding, and decrease the incidence of hematoma, especially can significantly reduce pain and increase patient’s tolerance. This method is safe and effective.
Key words: Tunnel-cuffed catheter, Hemodialysis, Uremia, Non-incision withdrawal technique, Patient’s tolerance, Postoperative complication
CLC Number:
R459.5
LIU Hai-yan, GENG Xing-hua, REN Wen-wen, ZHAO Na-xin, XIANG Pan. Exploration of the method to remove tunnel-cuffed catheter[J]. Chinese Journal of Blood Purification, 2025, 24(04): 313-316.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
URL: https://www.cjbp.org.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2025.04.012
https://www.cjbp.org.cn/EN/Y2025/V24/I04/313