Chinese Journal of Blood Purification ›› 2025, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (11): 956-963.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2025.11.017

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Brachiobasilic fistula vs. upper arm arteriovenous graft for dialysis access: a systematic review and meta-analysis

LI Dan  DU Zong-hua  DAI Feng-ming  LONG Qing  WANG Wei   

  1. Department of Nephrology, Enshi Prefecture Central Hospital, Hubei 445000, China; 2Department of Hand and Foot Surgery, Minda Hospital Affiliated to Hubei Minzu University, Hubei, 445000, China
  • Received:2025-02-24 Revised:2025-09-01 Online:2025-11-12 Published:2025-11-12
  • Contact: 445000 湖北,2湖北民族大学附属民大医院手足外科 E-mail:wm160000@163.com

Abstract: Objective  To compare the patency rates and complications of brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula (BBAVF) and upper extremity arteriovenous graft (AVG) as vascular access options, providing evidence to optimize tertiary vascular access selection.  Methods  We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and ScienceDirect databases and manually screened the references. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality. Data were extracted and a meta-analysis was performed to compare the one- and two-year patency rates and complication rates between BBAVF and AVG.  Results  A total of 24 studies were included. The BBAVF group demonstrated superior outcomes compared to the AVG group in terms of one-year primary (OR=1.837, 95% CI: 1.332~2.533, P<0.001), assisted (OR=2.242, 95% CI: 1.439~3.494, P<0.001), secondary (OR=1.465, 95% CI: 1.029~2.088, P=0.034), and cumulative patency rates (OR=1.739, 95% CI: 1.052~2.875, P=0.031). The BBAVF group also had better two-year primary (OR=2.140, 95% CI: 1.469~3.118, P<0.001), assisted (OR=2.529, 95% CI: 1.789~3.575, P<0.001), secondary (OR=1.748, 95% CI: 1.371~2.229, P<0.001), and cumulative patency rates (OR=2.002, 95% CI: 1.234~3.249, P=0.005). Regarding complications, the AVG group had a higher risk of postoperative infection (OR=0.207,  95% CI: 0.128~0.334, P<0.001), thrombosis (OR=0.285, 95% CI: 0.207~0.392, P<0.001), and steal syndrome (OR=0.628, 95% CI: 0.396~0.996, P=0.048), while the BBAVF group had a higher risk of bleeding (OR=2.725, 95% CI: 1.549~4.793, P=0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of aneurysm (OR=0.849, 95% CI: 0.457~1.577, P=0.605), anastomotic stenosis (OR=0.471, 95% CI: 0.133~1.666, P=0.243), or overall complications (OR=0.924, 95% CI: 0.502~1.701, P=0.799).  Conclusion  BBAVF is superior in terms of patency rate and control of infection and thrombosis, and is recommended as the first choice for patients with good vascular conditions. AVG is more suitable for urgent dialysis or for patients with poor vascular conditions.

Key words: End-stage renal disease, Dialysis, Vascular access, Brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula, Arteriovenous graft

CLC Number: