二次PTA 术后穿刺部位选择对内瘘功能的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2022.04.010

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【摘要】目的探讨二次经皮腔内血管成形术后(percutaneous translumin angioplasty,PTA)选择不同部位的血管穿刺行透析治疗对自体动静脉内瘘(autogenous arteriovenous fistula,AVF)功能的影响。方法前瞻性纳入桂林医学院附属医院行AVF II 类狭窄、二次PTA 术后60 例患者，随机分为试验组(手术后长期避开内瘘流出道动脉端的扩张段血管穿刺)、对照组(手术后2 周穿刺内瘘流出道动脉端
的扩张段血管)。收集2 组患者临床资料并随访12 个月，比较2 组患者手术后1、3、6、9 个月AVF 泵控血流量、肱动脉血流量、扩张段血管内径及血流量有无差异，手术后内瘘生存时长。结果随访12 个月，试验组在手术后6、9个月泵控血流量(t=4.026、4.317，P 均＜0.001)、肱动脉血流量(t=2.361、3.247，P=0.022、0.002)、扩张段血管内径(t=2.714、2.245，P=0.009、0.031)及血流量(t=3.274、2.625，P=0.002、0.012)明显高于对照组；随访期内2 组的中位通畅时间无统计学差异(χ²=2.316，P=0.128)。结论对于
行PTA 术内瘘的患者，选择长期避开扩张段血管的穿刺，有利于内皮细胞的修复，可维持长期良好的内瘘功能，并有可能延长二次PTA术后内瘘寿命，改善其远期通畅率。

关键词: 经皮腔内血管成形术, 内瘘, 扩张段血管, 血液透析

Abstract: 【Abstract】Objective To investigate the selection of puncture site after secondary percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) on the function of autologous arteriovenous fistula (AVF). Methods A total of 60 patients who underwent secondary PTA for AVF class II stenosis in our hospital were prospectively reviewed. They were randomly divided into experimental group, in which the puncture site was far from the dilated arterial end of the AVF outflow tract after PTA, and control group, in which the puncture site located at the dilated arterial end of the AVF outflow tract after PTA for 2 weeks. They were followed up for 12 months, and their
clinical data were collected. AVF pump-controlled blood flow, brachial artery blood flow, diameter of dilated vessel and blood flow in dilated vessel after PTA for 1, 3, 6 and 9 months as well as the survival time of the AVF after PTA were compared between the two groups. Results In experimental group and control group after PTA for 1, 3, 6 and 9 months, AVF pump-controlled blood flow was 230.22±12.29 vs. 227.26±11.28 (t=0.971, P=0.335) after one month, 230.36 ± 21.69 vs. 220.32 ± 20.37 (t=1.800, P= 0.077) after 3 months, 231.32 ± 19.31 vs. 210.42 ± 13.32 (t=4.026, P<0.001) after 6 months, and 231.32 ± 18.21 vs. 206.18 ± 16.22 (t=4.317, P< 0.001) after 9 months; brachial artery blood flow was 1260.62 ± 210.23 vs. 1235.56 ± 218.26 (t=0.452, P= 0.652) after one month, 1132.25±213.28 vs. 1028.34±217.25 (t=1.822, P=0.074) after 3 months, 1088.45±221.18 vs. 936.37± 219.36 (t=2.361, P=0.022) after 6 months, and 967.39± 219.22 vs. 729.61±217.18 (t=3.247, P=0.002) after 9 months; diameter of dilated vessel was 5.55±1.28 vs. 5.33±1.23 (t=0.678, P=0.499) after one month, 5.12 ± 1.36 vs. 4.67 ± 1.02 (t=1.409, P= 0.164) after 3 months, 5.06 ± 1.37 vs. 3.90 ± 1.56 (t=2.714, P=0.009) after 6 months, and 4.86±1.29 vs. 3.83±1.46 (t=2.245, P=0.031) after 9 months; blood flow in dilated vessel was 680.26 ± 38.66 vs. 678.14 ± 36.56 (t=0.218, P= 0.828) after one month, 672.11 ±137.63 vs. 623.23±135.51 (t=1.351, P=0.182) after 3 months, 638.21±135.24 vs. 510.37±131.62 (t=3.274, P=
0.002) after 6 months, and 621.27±136.23 vs. 502.87±132.12 (t=2.625, P=0.012) after 9 months. The AVF pump-controlled flow, brachial blood flow, diameter of dilated vessel, and blood flow in dilated vessel in the two groups had no differences after PTA for one and 3 months, but were significantly different after PTA for 6 and 9 months; The median patency period was similar between the two groups during the follow-up period (9.40 vs. 9.00, χ2=2.316, P=0.128), but had a trend of longer period in experimental group than in control group. Conclusion In patients undergoing secondary PTA for AVF, the puncture site should always be far
from the dilated vessel segment to facilitate the repair of endothelial cells and the preservation of function, patency and survival period of the AVF.

Key words: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, Internal fistula, Dilated blood vessel, Hemodialysis

中图分类号:

R318.16

王美莲, 易柏林, 李家莲, 潘喆, 全丽霞, 林芳健. 二次PTA 术后穿刺部位选择对内瘘功能的影响[J]. 中国血液净化, 2022, 21(04): 269-272.

参考文献

[1] Charmaine E.Lok et al. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access: 2019 update[J] .American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2020; 75(4)(suppl 2):S1-S164[J].American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2020, 75(4):1-164
[2]UK Renal Association.Clinical Practice Guideline: Vascular Access For Haemodialysis[C], Mick Kumwenda: UK Renal Association, 2015:1-26.
[3]金其庄, 王玉柱, 叶朝阳等.中国血液透析用血管通路专家共识第版[J].中国血液净化, 2019, 18(06):365-381
[4] Kukita K, Ohira S, Amano I, et al.Vascular Access Construction and Repair for Chronic Hemodialysis Guideline Working Group, Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy. 2011 update Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy Guidelines of Vascular Access Construction and Repair for Chronic Hemodialysis. Ther Apher Dial. 2015 Mar; 19 Suppl 1:1-39.[J].2011 update Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy Guidelines of Vascular Access Construction and Repair for Chronic Hemodialysis. Ther Apher Dial, 2015, 19(Suppl ):1-39
[5]Andrea K Viecelli et al.The pathogenesis of hemodialysis vascular access failure and systemic therapies for its prevention: Optimism unfulfilled[J].Seminars in Dialysis, 2018, 31(3):244-257
[6]刘威, 高占辉, 朱润章等.超声引导下经皮血管成形术治疗血透患者动静脉内瘘狭窄的疗效分析[J].中国超声医学杂志, 2021, 37(02):210-213
[7]朱景航, 库媛, 黄学卿等.经皮腔内血管成形术治疗血液透析动静脉内瘘狭窄效果的影响因素分析[J].介入放射学杂志, 2018, 27(11):1079-1084
[8] Schmidli J, Widmer MK, Basile C, et al.Editor' s Choice - Vascular Access: 2018 Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Jun; 55(6):757-818.[J].2018 Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS), 2018 , Jun;55((6)):757-818
[9]Martinez L，Duque JC，Tabbara M，et al.Fibrotic Venous Ｒemodeling and Nonmaturation of Arteriovenous Fistulas[J].J Am Soc Nephrol, 2018, 29(3):1030-1040
[10]卢松芳, 陈靖, 马鹏跃等，.超声引导下二次经皮腔内血管成形术治疗动静脉内瘘术后再狭窄效果观察[J][J].山东医药,, 2020,, 60((20)):55-57
[11]Farber A, Imrey PB, Huber TS, et al.Multiple preoperative and intraoperative factors predict early fistula thrombosis in the Hemodialysis Fistula Maturation Study[J].J Vasc Surg, 2016, 63(1):163-170
[12] Shiu YT, Litovsky SH, Cheung AK, et al.Preoperative Vascular Medial Fibrosis and Arteriovenous Fistula Development. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Sep 7; 11(9):1615-23.
[13]李霞, 李转欢.对达标且功能正常的自体动静脉内瘘行彩超评估的临床价值[J].中国血液净化, 2020, 19(06):398-402
[14]Timmy Lee et al.Comparison of postoperative ultrasound criteria to predict unassisted use of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis[J].The Journal of Vascular Access, 2018, 19(2):167-171
[15] Bountouris, Ioannis et al.“Is Repeat PTA of a Failing Hemodialysis Fistula Durable?.” International journal of vascular medicine vol. 2014 (2014): 369-687.
[16] Portugaller RH, Kalmar PI, Deutschmann H.The eternal tale of dialysis access vessels and restenosis: are drug-eluting balloons the solution?. J Vasc Access. 2014; 15(6):439-447.
[17]Andrea K Viecelli et al.The pathogenesis of hemodialysis vascular access failure and systemic therapies for its prevention: Optimism unfulfilled[J].Seminars in Dialysis, 2018, 31(3):244-257
[18]Evans Colin E.and Iruela-Arispe MLuisa and Zhao You-Yang. Mechanisms of Endothelial Regeneration and Vascular Repair and Their Application to Regenerative Medicine[J].The American Journal of Pathology, 2021, 191(1):52-65
[19] Evans CE, Iruela-Arispe ML, Zhao YY.Mechanisms of Endothelial Regeneration and Vascular Repair and Their Application to Regenerative Medicine. Am J Pathol. 2021 Jan; 191(1):52-65.
[20] Oprea A, Molnar A, Encic? S, et al.Effect of the veins histopathological characteristics and preexisting medical conditions on arteriovenous fistula maturation and primary patency in patients with end-stage renal disease: an observational, prospective study. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2017; 58(3):871-880.
[21]Wang Wei et al.The effect of endothelial progenitor cell transplantation on neointimal hyperplasia and reendothelialisation after balloon catheter injury in rat carotid arteries[J].Stem cell research & therapy, 2021, 12(1):99-99