|
Continuous plasma adsorption filtration and other intervention strategies for the treatment of acute drug intoxication
2016, 15 (07):
353-357.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2016.07.009
Objective To study continuous plasma adsorption filtration and other intervention strategies including monitoring of vital signs, pressure measurement in blood purification instrument, and anticoagulant during extracorporeal circulation for the treatment of acute drug poisoning. Methods This was a retrospective study for acute drug poisoning patients treated in the period of Jan. 2010 to May 2010 in the Center for Intoxication Emergency, Affiliated Hospital of Logistics College of Armed Police Force. Patients were treated with continuous plasma filtration adsorption (CPFA; group A, n=89), continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH; group B, n=89), or continuous plasma adsorption (group C, n=89). Systolic blood pressure, heart rate and venous pressure before continuous blood purification (CBP) and after CBP for 10, 30, and 60 minutes, blood coagulation function before CBP and after CBP for 3, 6, 12 hours, and blood flow velocity, arterial pressure, pressure before the filter, venous pressure, transmembrane pressure, and pressure difference across the filter after CBP for 0.5, 3, 6, and 12 hours were compared among the 3 groups. Results There were no differences in gender, age, and clinical diagnosis among the 3 groups (for gender: χ2=0.069, P=0.753; for age: χ2= 0.012, P=0.893; for clinical diagnosis: χ2=0.173, P=0.236). However, anticoagulation method was statistically different among the 3 groups (χ2=6.596, P=0.013). There were no statistical differences in systolic blood pressure, heart rate and venous pressure before CBP and after CBP for 10, 30 and 60 minutes among the 3 groups (for systolic blood pressure: F=1.154, 2.732, 2.132 and 1.117, P=0.532, 0.367, 0.473 and 0.532; for hear rate: F= 2.183, 1.105, 1.127 and 1.165, P=0.463, 0.537, 0.517 and 0.537; for venous pressure: F=2.132, 1.974, 2.118 and 2.734, P=0.162, 0.423, 0.397 and 0.476, before CBP and after CBP for 10, 30 and 60 minutes respectively). There were no statistical differences in activated clotting time (ACT), activated partial thromboplastin
time (APPT), and venous free Ca+2 before CBP and after CBP for 3, 6 and 12 hours among the 3 groups (for ACT: F=1.389, 0.832, 0.764 and 0.967, P=0.132, 0.475, 0.619 and 0.397; for APPT: F=0.893, 1.287, 1.769 and 1.197, P=0.513, 0.195, 0.096 and 0.197; for venous free Ca+2: F=2.174, 2.165, 1.135 and
0.973, P=0.093, 0.089, 0.298 and 0.498, before CBP and after CBP for 3, 6 and 12 hours respectively). There were no differences in blood flow velocity, arterial pressure and venous pressure after CBP for 0.5, 3, 6, and 12 hours among the 3 groups (for blood flow velocity: F=0.985, 1.125, 0.932 and 0.845, P=0.316, 0.367, 0.513 and 0.579; for arterial pressure: F=0.983, 0.875, 0.927 and 1.107, P=0.326, 0.516, 0.321 and 0.225; for venous pressure: F=1.832, 1.974, 0.893 and 1.134, P=0.187, 0.129, 0.132 and 0.176, after CBP for 30 minutes, 3, 6, and 12 hours respectively). However, there were statistical differences in pressure before the filter and pressure difference across the filter after CBP for 30 minutes, 3, 6, and 12 hours among the 3 groups (for pressure before the filter: F= 17.985, 20.125, 18.932, 25.845, P<0.001; for pressure difference across the filter: F=19.983, 23.875, 19.927, 17.107, P<0.001, after CBP for 30 minutes, 3, 6, and 12 hours respectively). Conclusion Although anticoagulation method was dissimilar, the coagulation function at several time points during CBP had no differences among the 3 groups. Pressure before the filter and pressure difference across the filter after CBP were statistically different among the 3 groups, but they were still in the normal ranges of CBP. The extracorporeal blood volume in CPFA is larger than that of CVVH and continuous plasma adsorption, but it can still be used for the treatment of drug intoxication through sophisticated intervention strategies.
Metrics
|