中国血液净化 ›› 2019, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (07): 477-481.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2019.07.004

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

中心静脉置管血液透析对紧急起始腹膜透析的影响

张文静1,吕佳1,王志刚1,李燕1,吕晶1,孙吉平1   

  1. 1西安交通大学第一附属医院肾内科
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-21 修回日期:2019-04-11 出版日期:2019-07-12 发布日期:2019-07-12
  • 通讯作者: 孙吉平jipingsundwy@126.com E-mail:jipingsundwy@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    十二五攻关项目;重大疾病的防控策略、诊疗规范及效果评价研究(2015BAI12B05)

The effects of hemodialysis with central venous catheterization on the urgent-start peritoneal Dialysis

  1. 1Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China
  • Received:2018-12-21 Revised:2019-04-11 Online:2019-07-12 Published:2019-07-12

摘要: 【摘要】目的明确中心静脉置管血液透析(hemodialysis with central venous catheterization, HD-CVC)对紧急起始腹膜透析(urgent-start peritoneal dialysis,USPD)的影响。方法回顾分析西安交通大学第一附属医院行USPD 的患者,依紧急起始腹膜透析前是否进行HD-CVC 过渡分2 组:USPD 组(不进行HD-CVC 过渡)和HD-PD 组(先进行HD-CVC 过渡,2 周内进行USPD),随访1 年,观察2 组临床生化指标、透析剂量、尿量、残余肾功能、透析充分性、腹膜透析并发症以及技术生存率等差异。结果①本研究共纳入患者482 人,USPD 组315 人,HD-PD 组167 人,2 组患者入组前性别、年龄、糖尿病肾病患者所占比例、肌酐、肾小球滤过率、血钾等差异无统计学意义(t/χ2值分别为0.727、-0.223、0.410、-1.824、-0.581、-1.506;P 值分别为0.394、0.824、0.522、0.069、0.562、0.133)。②在腹膜透析1 个月时,USPD 组残余肾功能、UKt/V、TKt/V 明显高于HD-PD 组,尿素氮和肌酐显著低于HD-PD 组,差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为2.026、3.342、2.134、-2.085、-2.194,P 值分别为0.043、0.001、0.033、0.038、0.029);在6 个月时,USPD 组尿量明显高于HD-PD 组,差异有统计学意义(t=3.082,P=0.002)。③2 组出口感染率、腹膜炎感
染率、机械并发症以及技术生存率差异均无统计学意义(1 个月时χ2值分别为1.434、0.435、0.199、0.059;P 值分别为0.231、0.509、0.656、0.807;6 个月时χ2 值分别为0.632、0.532、0.081、0.486;P 值分别为0.426、0.466、0.775、0.486;1 年时χ2 值分别为0.847、0.005、<0.001、1.254;P 值分别为0.357、0.945、0.997、0.263)。结论紧急起始腹膜透析前中心静脉置管血液透析可能影响早期残余肾功能和透析充分性,因此对于无急诊透析指征的终末期肾病患者不推荐腹膜透析前行HD-CVC过渡。

关键词: 紧急起始腹膜透析, 中心静脉置管, 血液透析

Abstract:

【Abstract】Objective To investigate the effects of hemodialysis with central venous catheterization (HDCVC) on urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (USPD). Methods This was a retrospective analysis on patients receiving USPD. According to whether the patient had HD-CVC before USPD, they were divided into USPD group (without HD-CVC before USPD) and HD-PD group (pretreated with HD-CVC for less than 2 weeks and then with USPD) and followed up for one year. Clinical biochemical indexes, dialysis dose, urine volume, residual renal function, dialysis adequacy, peritoneal dialysis complications and technical survival rate were compared between the two groups. Results ①A total of 482 patients were enrolled in this study, including 315 (average age 48.56±14.92 years) in USPD group and 167 (average age 48.87±14.49 years) in HD-PD group. The gender, age, proportion of diabetic nephropathy, and creatinine, glomerular filtration rate and blood potassium before admission had no statistical significances between the two groups (χ2 or t=0.727, -0.223, 0.410, -1.824, -0.581 and -1.506 respectively; P=0.394, 0.824, 0.522, 0.069, 0.562 and 0.133 respectively). ② After PD for one month, residual renal function, UKt/V and TKt/V were significantly higher in USPD group than in HD-PD group (4.41±4.0ml/min, 0.79±0.44, and 2.17±1.39 respectively in USPD group; 3.67±2.39ml/min, 0.64±0.42 and 1.92±0.55 respectively in HD-PD group; t=2.026, 3.342 and 2.134 respectively; P=0.043, 0.001 and 0.033 respectively); blood urea nitrogen and creatinine were significantly lower in USPD group than in HD-PD group (17.79 ± 4.96mmol/L and 663.15 ± 182.03μmol/L respectively in USPD group; 19.08±8.21 mmol/L and 711.02±280.3μmol/L respectively in HD-PD group; t=-2.085 and -2.194 respectively; P=0.038 and 0.029 respectively). After PD for 6 months, urine volume was significantly higher in USPD group than in HD- PD group (964.84 ± 539.95ml/d in USPD group; 794.39 ± 569.17ml/d in HD- PD group; t=3.082, P=0.002). ③ Orifice infection rate, peritonitis infection rate, mechanical complications and technical survival rate were similar between the two groups (after PD for one month: χ2=1.434, 0.435, 0.199, and 0.059 respectively; P=0.231, 0.509, 0.656 and 0.807 respectively; after PD for 6 months: χ2=0.632, 0.532, 0.081 and 0.486 respectively; P=0.426, 0.466, 0.775 and 0.486 respectively; after PD for one year: χ2=0.847, 0.005, <0.000 and 1.254 respectively; P=0.357, 0.945, 0.997 and 0.263 respectively). Conclusion HD-CVC before USPD affected residual renal function and dialysis adequacy of the patients. Therefore, HD-CVC as a pretreatment is not recommended in end-stage renal disease patients required PD but without the indication of emergency dialysis.

Key words: Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis, Central venous catheterization, Hemodialysis

中图分类号: