维持性血液透析患者带隧道带涤纶套导管意外脱管影响因素分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2022.02.014

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【摘要】目的探讨维持性血液透析(maintenance hemodialysis，MHD)患者带隧道带涤纶套导管(tunneled-cuffed catheter, TCC)意外脱管的影响因素。方法对福建医科大学附属第一医院2016年1 月～2021 年6 月TCC 意外脱管的21 例血液透析患者进行回顾性分析，采用系统抽样法抽取导管固定在位患者77 例为对照组，收集2 组临床一般资料及实验室资料作为观察项目，比较2 组资料，用Logistic 回归分析TCC 意外脱管的相关危险因素。结果同期符合入组标准共445 例患者，意外脱管率4.72%，Logistic 回归分析显示导管出口线结反应(OR=9.289,95% CI:1.767～48.841,P=0.008)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(OR=1.659,95% CI:1.05～2.613, P= 0.029)、血白蛋白(OR=0.813,95% CI:0.671～0.986, P=0.035)、血磷(OR=5.528,95% CI:1.486～20.560,P=0.011)为TCC 意外脱管独立危险因素。结论MHD患者TCC 意外脱管与导管出口线结反应、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、血白蛋白及血磷相关，提示积极控
制局部及全身炎症、改善营养状态、控制血磷可能对预防TCC 意外脱管有一定临床指导意义。

关键词: 维持性血液透析, 带隧道带涤纶套导管, 意外脱管, 影响因素

Abstract: 【Abstract】Objective To investigate the influencing factors relating to the accidental exit of tunneledcuffed catheter (TCC) in patients with maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). Methods Twenty-one MHD patients having the accidental exit of TCC during January 2016 to June 2021 treated in The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. Seventy- seven cases with TCC fixed in place were obtained by the system sampling method as the control group. Clinical data and laboratory results as the observation items were collected and compared between the two groups. Logistic regression was used
to analyze the relevant risk factors for accidental exit of TCC. Results There were 445 cases who met entry criteria in the period, and the rate of accidental exit was 4.72%. Multivariate regression analysis suggested that suture reaction at the TCC exit site (OR=9.289, 95% CI: 1.767～48.841, P=0.008), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (OR=1.659, 95% CI: 1.053～2.613, P= 0.029), serum albumin (ALB) (OR=0.813, 95% CI:0.671～0.986, P=0.035) and serum phosphate (P) (OR=5.528, 95% CI: 1.486～20.560, P=0.011) were the independent risk factors for accidental exit of TCC. Conclusions Suture reaction at the TCC exit site, NLR, ALB and P are the independent risk factors relating to accidental exit of TCC in MHD patient. Therefore, effective control of local and systemic inflammation, improvement of nutritional status, and active control of blood phosphate may have clinical significance for preventing accidental exit of TCC.

Key words: Maintenance hemodialysis, Tunneled-cuffed catheter, Accidental exit, Influence factor

中图分类号:

R318.16

李镇洲, 邹臻寰, 林贝多, 饶斯逸, 万建新. 维持性血液透析患者带隧道带涤纶套导管意外脱管影响因素分析[J]. 中国血液净化, 2022, 21(02): 126-130.

参考文献

[1]金其庄，王玉柱，叶朝阳，等.中国血液透析用血管通路专家共识第版[J].中国血液净化, 2019, 18(6):365-381 [2]Pa?ara V, Maksimovi? B, Gunja?a M, et al.Tunnelled haemodialysis catheter and haemo-dialysis outcomes: a retrospective cohort study in Zagreb,Croatia[J].BMJ Open, 2016, 6(5):e009757- [3]Agarwal AK, Haddad N, Boubes K.Avoiding problems in tunneled dialysis catheter placement[J].Semin Dial, 2019, 32(6):535-540 [4]Dumaine C, Kiaii M, Miller L, et al.Vascular Access Practice Patterns in Canada: A National Survey[J].Can J Kidney Health Dis, 2018, 5:- [5]Poinen K, Quinn RR, Clarke A, et al.Complications From Tunneled Hemodialysis Cathe-ters: A Canadian Observational Cohort Study[J].Am J Kidney Dis, 2019, 73(4):467-475 [6]Smereczyński A, Starzyńska T, Ko?aczyk K, et al.Tissue reactions of abdominal integu-ments to surgical sutures in sonography[J].J Ultrason, 2014, 14(56):21-7 [7].Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access[J][J].Am J Kidney Dis, 2006, 48:S176-247 [8]Lok CE, Huber TS, Lee T, et al.KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access: 2019 Update[J].Am J Kidney Dis, 2020, 75(4):S1-S164 [9]Chan CT, Blankestijn PJ, Dember LM, et al.Dialysis initiation,modality choice,access,and prescription: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference[J].Kidney Int, 2019, 96(1):37-47 [10]Delistefani F, Wallbach M, Müller GA, et al.Risk factors for catheter-related infections in patients receiving permanent dialysis catheter[J].BMC Nephrol, 2019, 20(1):199- [11]赵玉沛.普通外科缝合技术和缝线的发展历史现状和展望[J].中国实用外科杂志, 2008, 28(10):789-792 [12]Sahathevan S, Khor BH, Ng HM, et al.Understanding Development of Malnutrition in Hemodialysis Patients: A Narrative Review[J].Nutrients, 2020, 12(10):3147- [13]Lin YH.Nutritional Care in Acute and Chronic Illness][J].Hu Li Za Zhi, 2021, 68(3):4-6 [14]Okyay GU, Inal S, One? K, et al.Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in evaluation of inflam-mation in patients with chronic kidney disease[J].Ren Fail, 2013, 35(1):29-36 [15]Pineault J, Lamarche C, Bell R, et al.Association of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio With Inflammation and Erythropoietin Resistance in Chronic Dialysis Patients[J].Can J Kidney Health Dis, 2017, 4:- [16]Sachdeva M, Hung A, Kovalchuk O, et al.The initial vascular access type contributes to inflammation in incident hemodialysis patients[J].Int J Nephrol, 2012, 2012:1-8 [17]Buetti N, Ruckly S, Lucet JC, et al.Factors influencing local signs at catheter insertion site regardless of catheter-related bloodstream infections[J].Crit Care, 2021, 25(1):71- [18]van Gelder MK, Abrahams AC, Joles JA, et al.Albumin handling in different hemodialysis modalities[J].Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2018, 33(6):906-913 [19]Essadik R, Msaad R, Lebrazi H, et al.Assessing the prevalence of protein-energy wasting in haemodialysis patients: A cross-sectional monocentric study[J].Nephrol Ther, 2017, 13(7):537-543 [20]Ozen N, Cinar FI, Askin D, et al.Uremic pruritus and associated factors in hemodialysis patients: A multi-center study[J].Kidney Res Clin Pract, 2018, 37(2):138-147 [21]Ting SW, Fan PC, Lin YS, et al.Association between uremic pruritus and long-term out-comes in patients undergoing dialysis[J].J Am Acad Dermatol, 2020, 83(3):924-925 [22]Rayner HC, Larkina M, Wang M, et al.International Comparisons of Prevalence,Aware-ness,and Treatment of Pruritus in People on Hemodialysis[J].Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2017, 12(12):2000-2007