中国血液净化

中国血液净化 ›› 2018, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (01): 30-34.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2017.01.008

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

透前血压变异性对维持性血液透析患者远期预后的影响

吕玉风1,董海霞1   

  1. 1. 南京市中心医院血液净化中心
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-24 修回日期:2017-10-31 出版日期:2018-01-12 发布日期:2018-01-12
  • 通讯作者: 吕玉风:ninilv001@163.com E-mail:ninilv001@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    南京市医学科技发展项目(YKK11211)

The variability of pre-dialysis blood pressure on long-term prognosis in maintenance hemodialysis patients

  • Received:2017-04-24 Revised:2017-10-31 Online:2018-01-12 Published:2018-01-12

PDF

283

摘要： 目的观察维持性血液透析(maintenance hemodialysis，MHD)患者透析前血压变异性(blood pressure variability,BPV)，探讨其对远期预后的影响。方法记录2011 年3 月1 日至2011年5 月31 日共3 个月中，南京市中心医院50 例维持性血液透析患者的透析前收缩压、舒张压，计算其平均值及标准差，以血压离散系数表示血压变异性大小。同时记录患者一般情况、生化指标、心脏彩超检查结果。随访5 年，记录患者生存状况及死亡原因。将所有患者根据生存状况分为死亡组及生存组，多因素二元Logistic 回归分析BPV 是否是死亡的独立危险因素。结果透前收缩压变异性(systolic blood pressure variability ,SBPV)与舒张压变异性(diastolic blood pressure variability, DBPV)分别为(8.5±2.1)%、(9.3±2.8)%，5 年后12 名患者死亡，死亡率24.0%。单因素方差分析显示死亡组年龄(F=19.817，P＜0.001)、体质量指数(body mass index，BMI) (F=8.012，P=0.007)、左房内径(left atrial diameter,LAD)(F=4.379，P=0.042)、室间隔厚度(interventricular septal thickness,IVS)(F=7.655，P=0.008)、SBPV(F=21.977，P＜0.001)、DBPV(F=22.433，P＜0.001)高于生存组，而死亡组平均收缩压(F=4.081，P=0.049)、舒张压(F=5.871，P=0.019)、透前血肌酐(F=8.375，P=0.006)水平较低,差异均具有统计学意义。经c2检验糖尿病组患者死亡率高于非糖尿病组(c2=5.852,P=0.016)。将以上具有统计学意义的各单因素指标纳入多因素二元Logistic 回归分析，以是否死亡作为因变量，结果年龄(OR=1.186,95% Cl1.108～1.381，P=0.028)、糖尿病(OR=3.250,95% Cl1.235～8.554，P=0.017)、SBPV(OR=2.622,95% Cl1.346～5.109,P=0.005)、DBPV(OR=2.147,95% Cl1.059～4.352，P=0.034)、血肌酐(OR=0.993,95% Cl-0.985～0.000，P=0.046)被引入回归方程，具有统计学意义。而平均收缩压、舒张压均未被引入方程。结论透前SBPV及DBPV 可能是MHD 患者全因死亡的独立危险因素。

关键词: 血压变异性, 血液透析, 透析前

Abstract: Objective Blood pressure variability (BPV) is a putative risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. The purposes of this study are to determine whether pre-dialysis BPV correlates to all-cause mortality in this cohort of MHD patients. Methods A total of 50 MHD patients were enrolled in this study. During the period from March 1st, 2011 to May 1st, 2011, their systolic pressure (SBP) and diastolic pressure (DBP) were recorded before every dialysis session for 2 weeks, and the mean systolic pressure (SBP) and mean diastolic pressure (DBP) were calculated. BPV was expressed as coefficient of variability, and their survival status and the cause of death were recorded in the next 5 years. The patients were then divided into survival group and death group. Results Systolic blood pressure variability (SBPV) and diastolic blood pressure variability (DBPV) were 8.5±2.1% and 9.3±2.8%, respectively. Twelve of the 50 patients (24.0%) died in the 5 years of follow-up period. Analyses using one-way ANOVA showed that age (F=19.817, P＜0.001), BMI (F=8.012, P=0.007), IVS (F=7.655, P=0.008), LAD (F=4.379, P=0.042), SBPV (F=21.977, P＜0.001) and DBPV (F=22.433, P＜0.001) were significantly higher in death group than in survival group. Meanwhile, SBP (F=4.081, P=0.049), DBP (F=5.871, P=0.019) and serum creatinine (F=8.375, P=0.006) were lower in death group than in survival group. Patients with diabetes had higher mortality than those without diabetes (c2=5.852, P=0.016). Multivariate binary logistic regression to analyze the statistically significant variables using death and survival as the dependent variables found that age (OR=1.186, 95% CI 1.108～1.381, P=0.028), diabetes (OR=3.250, 95% CI 1.235～8.554, P=0.017), serum creatinine (OR=0.993, 95% CI -0.985～0.000, P=0.046), SBPV (OR=2.622, 95% CI 1.346～5.109, P=0.005) and DBPV (OR=2.147, 95% CI 1.059～4.352, P=0.034) were independently correlated with all-cause mortality. SBP and DBP were not included in the regression analyses. Conclusion Pre- dialytic SBPV and DBPV may be the independent risk factors for all-cause mortality in MHD patients.

Key words: Hemodialysis, Blood pressure variability,  , Pre-dialysis