中国血液净化 ›› 2020, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (02): 85-87.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2020.02.004

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

自拟慢泡快冲改良预充法在无肝素血液透析中的临床观察

陆晓凤1,金炜1,杨丽红1,张艳霞1,钱玲玲1,赵湘2   

  1. 1. 浙江省桐乡市第一人民医院肾内科
    2. 浙江省人民医院肾脏病科
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-13 修回日期:2019-12-05 出版日期:2020-02-20 发布日期:2020-02-12
  • 通讯作者: 赵湘zhaoxiang7-7@163.com E-mail:zhaoxiang7-7@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省自然科学基金资助项目(LY16H05004);浙江省科技厅公益项目(2015C33204);桐乡市引导性科技计划项目(201702095)

Clinical observation on the modified pre-flushing method of soaking slowly and rushing fast in heparinfree hemodialysis

  1. 1Department of Nephrology, Tongxiang First People’s Hospital, Tongxiang 314500, China;   2Department of Nephrology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou 310014, China
  • Received:2019-06-13 Revised:2019-12-05 Online:2020-02-20 Published:2020-02-12

摘要:

【摘要】目的探讨自拟慢泡快冲改良预充法在无肝素抗凝血液透析(hemodialysis,HD)中的临床应用价值。方法选择2018 年1 月~2019 年3 月间桐乡市第一人民医院血液净化中心行无肝素抗凝的血液透析患者38 例,随机分为2 组。A 组:采用传统方法进行透析器及管路预充;B 组:采用慢泡快冲改良法进行预冲。每组19 例,每例患者观察周期4 例次。记录透析过程中透析器及管路凝血评级、生理盐水冲洗次数、透析时间等,并于第4 例次HD 时测定eKt/V。结果相比采用传统方法,B 组患者在透析器、透析管路凝血0 级、II 级、III 级的比较差异均有统计学意义(t 值分别为7.851,3.437,8.774;P 值分别为0.013,0.009,<0.001);生理盐水冲洗次数比较中,0 次、1 次、3 次、≥4 次经比较差异具有统计学意义(t 值分别为7.602,8.959,5.848,8.192;P 值分别为0.031,0.006,0.024,0.018);2 组HD 时间≥3h 的百分率分别为87.2%、97.4%,经比较差异具有统计学意义(t=6.752,P=0.011);2 组eKt/V 达标率比较差异具有统计学意义(t =8.039,P =0.023)。结论自拟慢泡快冲改良预充法在无肝素抗凝HD 治疗中,应用简单、经济、安全,且不影响透析充分性。

关键词: 无肝素, 改良预充, 血液透析

Abstract:

【Abstract】Objective To discuss clinical application value of the modified pre-flushing method by soaking slowly and rushing fast in heparin-free hemodialysis. Methods A total of 38 patients of heparin-free dialysis in the Blood Purification Center of Tongxiang First People’s Hospital from Jan. 2018 to Mar. 2019 were enrolled in this study. They were randomly divided into two groups. The traditional pre-flushing method of dialyzer and pipeline was used in the group A (n=19), and the modified method of soaking slowly and rushing fast was used in the group B (n=19). The observation period was 4 dialysis sessions for every patient. Blood clotting grade in dialyzer and pipeline, the number of flushing by normal saline, and actual dialysis time were
recorded. eKt/V was estimated at the fourth hemodialysis session for every patient. Results Blood clotting in dialyzer and pipeline at 0、II and III grades were better in group B than in group A (t=7.851, 3.437 and 8.774 respectively; P=0.013, 0.009 and <0.001 respectively). Normal saline flushing for 0, 1, 3 and ≥4 times were statistically different between group A and B (t=7.602, 8.959, 5.848 and 8.192 respectively; P=0.031, 0.006, 0.024 and 0.018 respectively). The percentage of hemodialysis time greater than or equal to 3h was 87.2% and 97.4% in group A and B respectively (t=6.752, P=0.011). The rate of eKt/V compliant with the standard was 82.1% in group A and 94.8% in group B (t=8.039, P=0.023). Conclusion The modified preflushing method of soaking slowly and rushing fast in heparin-free hemodialysis was simple, inexpensive and safe and did not affect the adequacy of hemodialysis. This method is worthy to be used clinically.

Key words: Heparin-free, Modified pre-flushing, Hemodialysis

中图分类号: