中国血液净化

中国血液净化 ›› 2025, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (06): 504-507.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2025.06.013

• 血管通路 • 上一篇    下一篇

小内径头静脉在动静脉内瘘中的应用

方 帆    余文洪    陈良婧   

  1. 401121 重庆，1重庆松山医院肾内科
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-12 修回日期:2025-03-14 出版日期:2025-06-12 发布日期:2025-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 陈良婧 E-mail:cqmuff@163.com

Application of small inner diameter cephalic vein in construction of autogenous arteriovenous fistula

FANG Fan, YU Wen-hong, CHEN Liang-jing   

  1. Department of Nephrology, Songshan General Hospital, Chongqing 401121, China
  • Received:2024-08-12 Revised:2025-03-14 Online:2025-06-12 Published:2025-06-12
  • Contact: 401121 重庆，1重庆松山医院肾内科 E-mail:cqmuff@163.com

摘要： 目的  探索小内径头静脉在自体动静脉内瘘(arteriovenous fistula，AVF)成型术中的应用。 方法  对2022年1月1日─2023年12月31日在重庆松山医院肾内科行AVF成型术的患者进行回顾性研究，将患者分为手术前检查手术部位桡动脉内径≥1.5 mm、束臂2分钟头静脉内径1.5～2 mm患者分为小内径组，手术部位桡动脉内径≥1.5 mm、手术部位束臂2分钟头静脉内径≥2mm为常规内径组，手术均由同一位手术医师主刀，比较手术后8周肱动脉流量达标情况，透析时最大泵控血流量达标情况，以及尿素清除率(urea reduction ratio，URR)达标情况。 结果 通过比较小内径头静脉组与常规头静脉内径组AVF的成熟和使用情况，发现2组患者AVF在8周后肱动脉流量达标率(χ2=2.009，P=0.156)、透析最大泵控血流量达标率(χ2=2.509，P=0.113)、尿素清除率达标率(χ2=2.979，P=0.084)差异没有统计学意义。 结论 小内径组与常规内径组AVF在成熟与使用上无统计学差异。对于手术前头静脉内径小于2.0 mm,但大于等于1.5 mm的患者，建立AVF的成功率仍较高，可尝试开展。

关键词: 终末期肾病, 血液透析, 血管通路, 自体动静脉内瘘

Abstract: Objective  To explore the application of small inner diameter cephalic vein in construction of autogenous arteriovenous fistula (AVF).   Methods  A retrospective study was conducted on patients undergoing AVF construction at the Department of Nephrology, Chongqing Songshan Hospital from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2023. According to the inner diameter of the cephalic vein at the preoperative surgical site, they were divided into a small inner diameter group and a conventional inner diameter group. The operation was performed by one surgeon. Brachial artery flow rate at 8 weeks after operation, maximum pump-controlled blood flow during dialysis, and urea clearance rate were compared between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0 software, and P＜0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.  Results  By comparing maturity and use of AVF between the small inner diameter group and the conventional inner diameter group, we found that there were no significant differences in brachial artery flow rate (χ2=2.009, P=0.156), dialysis maximum pump-controlled blood flow rate (χ2=2.509, P=0.113), and urea clearance rate (χ2=2.979, P=0.084) after 8 weeks between the two groups.  Conclusion  There were no statistical differences in maturity and use of AVF between the small inner diameter group and the conventional inner diameter group. For patients with preoperative cephalic vein diameter less than 2.0 mm, but greater than or equal to 1.5 mm, the success rate of AVF construction is still high, warranting to be tried surgically.

Key words: End-stage renal disease, Hemodialysis, Vascular access, Autologous arteriovenous fistula

中图分类号: