›› 2004, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1): 24-26.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

Kt/V值测定研究

苏 伟 郭宝茹 尚有全 高惠玲   

  1. 721008 宝鸡,陕西省宝鸡市中心医院
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2004-01-19 发布日期:2004-01-19

  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2004-01-19 Published:2004-01-19

摘要: 目的 探讨在实际临床应用中Kt/V值测定时应注意的问题;国人分别根据单室与双室模型所测定BUN及Kt/V值(Kt/Vsp与Kt/Vsq)间的差异以及复用透析器对Kt/V值的影响。 方法 18例规律透析的尿毒症患者共测定Kt/V值42例次。观察比较Kt/Vsp(单室模型Kt/V)与Kt/ Vsq (双室模型Kt/V)、BUNsp(单室模型BUN)与BUNsq(双室模型BUN)间的差别,以及不同复用次数透析器对Kt/V值的影响。 结果 国人单室模型与双室模型的Kt/Vsp与Kt/Vsq间有显著性差异(P<0.001),前者均值较后者高0.145。 BUNsq值是BUNsp值的111.6%。透析器分别复用1~2次组与未复用透析器组相比其Kt/V 值无显著性差别(P> 0.05)。 结论 Kt/Vsp 与 Kt/Vsq 间有显著性差异, 但较国外报道的差异小(0.145对0.200)。BUNsq与BUNsp的差异也较国外明显为低(111.6%对170.0%)。复用透析器1~2次对Kt/V值无明显影响。每周透析两次需要较每周透析3次更高的Kt/V值。

关键词: 透析充分性, 尿素动力模型

Abstract:

Objective To find out the key aspect that is important for measuring Kt/ Vcorrectly, The difference of Chinese between BUNsp vs BUNsq and Kt/Vsp vs. Kt/Vsq; The effect of reusing dialyser on Kt/V. Methods Eighteen routine hemodialysis patients were measured Kt/V for 42 times. Compare Kt/V sp(single-pool Kt/V)vs Kt/Vsq(equilibrated Kt/V), BUNsp(BUN concentration at the end of hemodialysis)vs BUNsq(equilibrated post-dialysis BUN concentration), and the Kt/V among different dialyser reusing time groups. Result There was significant difference between Kt/Vsp and Kt/Vsq(P<0.001), the difference of their average value is 0.145 BUNsq is 111.6% higher than BUNsp. There was no significant difference of Kt/V among different dialyser reusing time groups(P>0.05). Conclusion The difference between Kt/Vsp and Kt/Vsq is significant, but the difference is smaller than the result from overseas (0.145 vs. 0.200), The difference between BUNsp and BUNsq is much lower than overseas result (111.6 vs. 170.0). There is no significant difference among different reusing time dialyser groups (less than 2 times). Higher Kt/V is need for twice-weekly hemodialysis patient than thrice-weekly hemodialysis one.

Key words: Urea kinetic model 

中图分类号: