›› 2011, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (11): 606-609.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2011.11.00

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

日间静静脉血液透析滤过在脓毒血症合并急性肾损伤的应用

张 汀 王 艳 阿 胜 陈孟华   

  1. 宁夏医科大学总医院肾脏内科
  • 收稿日期:2011-04-03 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2011-11-12 发布日期:2011-11-12
  • 通讯作者: 陈孟华

Application of daytime continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration for the treatment of sepsis with acute kidney injury patients

ZHANG Ting, WANG Yan, A Sheng, CHEN Meng-hua   

  1. Department of Nephrology, Affiliated Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China
  • Received:2011-04-03 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2011-11-12 Published:2011-11-12

摘要:

目的 研究日间静静脉血液透析滤过(Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration, CVVHDF)在脓毒血症合并急性肾损伤(Acute Kidney Injury,AKI)患者治疗中的应用和影响预后的因素。 方法 观察分析宁夏医科大学总医院肾脏内科采用日间静静脉血液透析滤过以置换流量35~40mL/( kg·h)、透析液流量1500~2000 mL/h为方案救治的16例脓毒血症合并急性肾损伤患者的资料,评估临床特点和影响预后的因素。 结果 7例(43.8%)患者度过疾病的急性期(存活组),APACHEⅡ评分为(25.4±6.7);9例(56.2%)患者在急性期死亡(死亡组),APACHEⅡ 评分为(34.4±4.3)。对2组患者的临床资料、生化指标、机械通气状况、脏器损伤的特点、疾病的严重程度等因素进行分析,发现2组患者应用CVVHDF治疗前的机械通气状况、脏器衰竭数量、血钠、尿量之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。同时,死亡组APACHEⅡ评分(急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分II)高于存活组,代谢性酸中毒严重程度明显。 结论 日间CVVHDF可降低脓毒血症合并急性肾损伤患者的死亡率。脓毒血症患者的预后受患者是否存在机械通气、脏器衰竭数量、血钠水平、代谢性酸中毒程度及APACHEⅡ分值的影响。

关键词: 连续性静静脉血液透析滤过 脓毒血症 急性肾损伤

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) in treating critically ill patients with sepsis and acute renal injury. Methods The clinical features and factors affecting prognosis were retrospectively analyzed in 16 critically ill patients with sepsis and acute renal injury who received daytime CVVHDF in this hospital from Jan. 2009 to Feb. 2009. Patients received this treatment schedule with CVVHDF of 35-40 ml per kilogram of body weight per hour and 1500-2000 ml dialysate per hour. Results Seven patients (43.8%) survived the acute phase of their illness, with APACHE Ⅱ score being 25.4±6.7; whereas nine patients (56.2%) died during the acute phase, with APACHE Ⅱ score being 34.4±4.3. Clinical data, biochemical parameters, mechanical ventilation, characteristics of organ failure, and severity of the illness were analyzed between the two groups. There were significant differences in plasma sodium, urinary volume, number of failure organs and mechanical ventilation between the two groups before CVVHDF treatment (P<0.05). Meanwhile, higher APACHE II score and severer metabolic acidosis were found in the died group. Conclusion Daytime CVVHDF is useful for the decrease of mortality rate in critically ill patients with sepsis and acute renal failure. The prognosis of these patients is correlated to mechanical ventilation, number of affected organs, plasma sodium concentration, metabolic acidosis and APACHE Ⅱ score.

Key words: Sepsis, Acute kidney injury