中国血液净化

中国血液净化 ›› 2014, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (05): 401-404.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2014.05.012

• 血管通路 • 上一篇    下一篇

血液透析患者临时中心静脉导管相关感染的回顾性研究

王俊,齐华林,江薇,王奕,刘峰,张颖莹,严海东,庄守纲   

  1. 同济大学附属东方医院肾内科
  • 收稿日期:2013-10-12 修回日期:2014-01-24 出版日期:2014-05-12 发布日期:2014-05-11
  • 通讯作者: 庄守纲 wangjun7901@126.com E-mail:gangzhuang@hotmail.com

Retrospective study of the temporary central venous catheter related infection in the hemodialysis patients

  • Received:2013-10-12 Revised:2014-01-24 Online:2014-05-12 Published:2014-05-11

RichHTML

3

PDF

386

摘要： 目的 通过对临床病例资料的回顾性研究，探讨使用临时中心静脉导管的血液透析患者发生中心静脉导管相关感染(Central venous catheters related infections，CVC-RI)的情况及危险因素。方法 以同济大学附属东方医院肾内科2010年1月至2013年6月临时中心静脉插管的132例血液透析患者为研究对象，收集临床资料和生化指标，分析CVC-RI的发生情况及危险因素。结果 1. 132例患者中，平均年龄(67.26±16.68)岁，共行中心静脉置管术149例次，留置时间的中位数为27天（8-51天），其中右侧股静脉置管41例次，右侧颈内静脉91例次。符合中心静脉导管相关感染诊断标准的病人31例，CVC-RI发病率为23.5%。2. 置管后发生感染的时间最短9d，最长41d，其中14d以内4例(12.9%)，15d~2ld 9例(29%)，22d~28d 13例(41.9%)，28d以上5例(16.1%)。不同置管时间的感染率有统计学差异(P<0.05)。3.颈内静脉和股静脉置管的感染分别为13例(41.9%)和18例(58.1%)。二者比较无统计学意义(p>0.05)。4. CVC-RI患者相关培养中革兰阳性菌17例（54.8%）和革兰阴性菌14例（45.2%），二者比较无统计学差异（p>0.05）。5.年龄、留置时间、穿刺过程是否顺利、有无他处感染、糖尿病、是否使用免疫抑制剂均是导致CVC-RI的危险因素（P<0.05）。结论 1. 年龄、留置时间、穿刺过程是否顺利、有无他处感染、糖尿病、是否使用免疫抑制剂是导致CVC-RI的危险因素。2.静脉置管时间大于2周的患者CVC-RI发生率明显增高。3. 颈内静脉和股静脉置管患者CVC-RI的发生无明显差异。4.CVC-RI患者中革兰阳性菌和阴性菌发生感染的比例无明显差异。

关键词: 中心静脉导管, 感染, 血液透析

Abstract: Objective To retrospectively investigate the prevalence and risk factors of central venous catheter related infections (CVC-RI) in hemodialysis patients with venous indwelling catheters. Methods A total of 132 hemodialysis patients with short-term indwelling catheters and treated in East Hospital of Tongji University
in the period from January, 2010 to June, 2013 were enrolled in this study. Their clinical data and the prevalence and risk factors of CVC-RI were analyzed. Results In the 132 hemodialysis patients, the catheters were located in femoral vein in 41 cases and in internal jugular vein in 91 cases, with a total of 149 venous catheterizations. The median duration of indwelling catheterization was 27 days (8-51 days). CVC-RI was found in 31 cases with the prevalence of 23.5%. In the 31 case, CVC-RI occurred in the first 14 days after catheterization in 4 cases (12.9%), within 15th-2lst days in 9 cases (29%), within 22nd-28th days in 13 cases (41.9%), and after 28 days in 5 cases (16.1%). Therefore, the prevalence of CVC-RI was significantly variable in different duration after catheterization (P＜0.05). The prevalence of CVC-RI was similar in patients with jugular vein catheterization and in those with femoral vein catheterization (41.9% and 58.1%, respectively; P＞0.05). Gram-positive bacteria were detected in 17 cases, and Gram-negative bacteria in 14 cases (54.8% and 45.2%, respectively; P＞0.05). The prevalence of CVC-RI correlated significantly to indwelling duration, age, infections in other sites, puncture manipulation, use of immunosuppressive agents, and diabetes (P＜ 0.05). Conclusions The prevalence of CVC-RI correlated closely to indwelling duration, age, infection in other sites, puncture manipulation, use of immunosuppressive agents, and diabetes. The prevalence of CVC-RI became higher in patients with indwelling catheters for more than two weeks. The prevalence of CVC-RI was similar in patients with jugular vein catheters and in those with femoral vein catheters. The numbers of CVCRI patients due to Gram-positive bacteria and those due to Gram-negative bacteria were approximately equal.

Key words: Central venous catheters, Infection, Hemodialysis