中国血液净化 ›› 2017, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (09): 643-645.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2017.09.015

• 作者?编者 • 上一篇    下一篇

医学论文在编辑加工环节常见退修原因分析与建议

于媛1,2, 赵青艺1,2, 王洋1,2, 韦洮1,2, 左力1, 王梅1,2   

  1. 1. 北京大学人民医院肾内科 2.《中国血液净化》杂志社
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-22 修回日期:2017-07-01 出版日期:2017-09-12 发布日期:2017-09-12
  • 通讯作者: 韦洮:weitao63@163.com E-mail:duaiyuan517@aliyun.com

The frequent reasons for manuscript revision by authors during the editing stage: analysis and suggestions

  • Received:2017-06-22 Revised:2017-07-01 Online:2017-09-12 Published:2017-09-12

摘要: 目的  分析医学论文发表前在“编辑加工”环节退修的原因,为提高医学论文作者的写作水平和医学论文的学术质量提供参考。方法审读《中国血液净化》杂志2015 年8 月~2016 年7 月的进入“编辑加工”稿件的退修意见,对其中的常见问题进行归纳总结。结果医学论文在“编辑加工”环节退修的主要原因如下:①摘要冗长、结果缺乏客观性;②文中第1 次出现的的英文缩写没有给出中文和英文全称;③统计学方法描述缺陷;④图表缺乏自明性或者图表内容与正文重复;⑤参考文献著录格式不规范。结论提高论文质量是缩短编辑加工周期、进而缩短发表周期的核心环节,医学论文作者需要规范论文书写方式,注意摘要、图表的书写方法,统计学方法的描述,参考文献的著录格式。

关键词: 医学论文, 写作规范, 学术编辑

Abstract: Objectives This paper analyzed the reasons for author’s revision of the manuscript asked by the editorial board before published in order to promote author’s writing skills and to provide suggestions for higher academic quality of medical papers on journals. Methods We reviewed and summarized the suggestions to authors for manuscript revision during the editing period from Aug. 2015 to Jul. 2016 before published on Chinese Journal of Blood Purification. Results The main reasons for revision by authors during the editing period were ①big abstract and the conclusion drawn without objective bases, ②no Chinese and English full name for English abbreviation when it first appears, ③ inappropriate description of statistical methods, ④charts and tables only for reiteration of text content and without self-clarity, and ⑤informal format for references. Conclusion Higher quality of the medical manuscript is a key issue to speed up editing process cycle and publication period. The authors should be familiar with the formats of medical thesis, abstract, chart, table and references, and the description of statistical method.

Key words: Medical Paper, Writing Standard, Academic Editor