中国血液净化 ›› 2026, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (06): 518-522.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2026.06.015

• 血管通路 • 上一篇    下一篇

带CUFF导管患者凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌菌株分布、多检测方法一致性及临床干预研究

徐卓佳   梁国玉   杨薇娜   王 铠   

  1. 中心静脉导管;凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌;药敏结果;基因同源性;脉冲场凝胶电泳
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-18 修回日期:2026-02-10 出版日期:2026-06-12 发布日期:2026-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 王铠 E-mail:Nephrology_CAGH@163.com

Studies on the distribution of coagulase-negative staphylococcus strains in maintenance hemodialysis patients with tunnel cuffed catheters, the consistency of multiple detection methods, and the clinical intervention

XU Zhuo-jia, LIANG Guo-yu, YANG Wei-na, WANG Kai   

  1. Department of Nephrology, Civil Aviation General Hospital, Beijing 100123, China
  • Received:2025-09-18 Revised:2026-02-10 Online:2026-06-12 Published:2026-06-12
  • Contact: 100123 北京,1民航总医院肾内科 E-mail:Nephrology_CAGH@163.com

摘要: 目的 明确单透析中心长期留置带CUFF导管患者凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(coagulase-negative staphiylococci,CNS)菌群分布及耐药特征,验证同一标本多检测方法[细菌培养、细菌自动鉴定(automated testing for bacteria,ATB)、脉冲场凝胶电泳(pulsed field gel electrophoresis,PFGE)]的一致性,区分菌株临床意义(定植/感染前期/感染期),为临床精准防控与分层干预提供依据。 方法 选取2020年1月—2025年1月于民航总医院透析中心收治的216例带CUFF导管患者,定期采集导管相关部位及鼻腔标本,同步进行细菌培养、ATB药敏试验及PFGE基因同源性分析,结合临床症状判定菌株意义。 结果 共分离出CNS 109株(12.62%),主要来源于敷料覆盖外颈部皮肤(53株,48.62%),表皮葡萄球菌占比最高(56株,51.38%);CNS对青霉素耐药率83.49%(91/109),对替加环素、万古霉素敏感率100%(109/109)。多检测方法一致性良好(细菌培养+ATB鉴定Kappa=0.89,培养+PFGE分型Kappa=0.78)。109株菌株中定植75.23%(82/109)、感染前期22.02%(24/109)、感染期2.75%(3/109);PFGE提示存在跨患者克隆传播(同源率18.67%,28/150)及自身跨部位定植(同源率66.67%,16/24)。 结论 带CUFF导管患者CNS定植率高,多检测方法可相互验证;临床需通过定期筛查、分层干预降低感染风险,PFGE适用于常规同源性筛查。

关键词: 中心静脉导管, 凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌, 药敏结果, 基因同源性, 脉冲场凝胶电泳

Abstract: Objective  To clarify the distribution and drug resistance characteristics of coagulase-negative staphylococcus floras in patients with long-term indwelling tunnel cuffed catheters in a single dialysis center, to verify the consistency of the multiple detection methods including bacterial culture, automated testing for bacteria (ATB), and pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) for the same specimen, and to distinguish the clinical significance of colonization, pre-infection and infection period of the strains, in order to provide references for precise prevention, control and stratified intervention.  Methods  A total of 216 hemodialysis patients with tunnel cuffed catheters admitted to the Dialysis Center of Civil Aviation General Hospital from January 2020 to January 2025 were recruited for this study. Specimens from their catheter-related areas and nasal cavities were collected, and were subjected to bacterial culture, ATB, drug sensitivity test, and PFGE for gene homology analysis. The significance of the identified strains was evaluated in conjunction with clinical symptoms.  Results  A total of 109 coagulase-negative staphylococcus strains (12.62%) were isolated, mainly from external neck skins covered with dressings (53 strains, 48.62%). Staphylococcus epidermidis accounted for 51.38% of the strains (56 strains). These coagulase-negative staphylococci were resistant to penicillin (91/109, 83.49%), but sensitive to tigecycline and vancomycin (109/109, 100%). The consistency of the detection methods was satisfied, with Kappa=0.89 for bacterial culture/ATB and Kappa=0.78 for culture/PFGE typing (Kappa≥0.75 was defined as good consistency). Among the 109 strains, 75.23% (82/109) were considered to be colonization, 22.02% (24/109) were attributed to the pathogens of pre-infection stage, and 2.75% (3/109) to the pathogens of infection stage. PFGE indicated the existence of cross-patient clonal transmission (homology rate 18.67%, 28/150) and self-cross-site colonization (homology rate 66.67%, 16/24).  Conclusion  Patients with tunnel cuffed catheters have a higher rate of coagulase-negative staphylococcal colonization. Multiple detection methods are helpful to check accuracy each other. Clinically, regular screening and stratified intervention can reduce the risk of infection. PFGE is suitable for routine homology characterization.

Key words: Tunneled cuffed catheter, Coagulase-negative staphylococcus, Drug sensitivity test, Gene homology, Pulsed field gel electrophoresis

中图分类号: