中国血液净化 ›› 2019, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (11): 772-775.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2019.11.011

• 血管通路 • 上一篇    下一篇

2 条生命线的困境:起搏器和透析导管

侯西彬1,杨涛1,余阳2,詹申1,任树风1,王玉柱1   

  1. 1. 北京市海淀医院(北京大学第三医院海淀院区)肾内科
    2.北京市海淀医院(北京大学第三医院海淀院区)心内科
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-12 修回日期:2019-09-04 出版日期:2019-11-12 发布日期:2019-10-28
  • 通讯作者: 王玉柱 wyz4417@126.com E-mail:wyz4417@126.com

Dilemma of double lifelines: pacemaker and tunnel-cuffed catheter

  1.  1Department of Nephrology and 2Department of Cardiology, Haidian Hospital (Haidian Section of Peking University Third Hospital), Beijing 100080, China
  • Received:2019-02-12 Revised:2019-09-04 Online:2019-11-12 Published:2019-10-28

摘要: 【摘要】目的探讨存在起搏器导线的情况下置入颈内静脉带涤纶套透析导管以及两者共存是否具有可行性。方法选取2014 年4 月~2018 年8 月北京市海淀医院肾内科存在起搏器导线患者数字减影血管造影(digital subtraction angiography,DSA)下置入带涤纶套透析导管病例17 例,观察术中及术后起搏器电极、导线有无移位,起搏器功能有无异常。随访期间观察透析导管、起搏器导线感染发生率、症状性静脉高压征发生率以及拔除导管时是否发生导管嵌顿。结果17 例患者中,15 例导管尖端顺利进入右心房中上部,1例球囊扩张上腔静脉狭窄后置入导管,1 例导管置入过程中顶在起搏器导线上,经调整方向后导管尖端顺利进入右心房中上部。术中及术后起搏器电极、导线无移位,起搏器功能无异常;随访期间所有患者均未出现起搏器导线感染及起搏器功能不良。1 例在置管1 年后出现导管相关性感染,予以抗感染治疗及更换导管后好转,起搏器导线未受到感染。1 例出现置管侧上肢轻度肿胀,但不需要
临床干预。原位更换导管9 例,拔除原导管时均未发生导管嵌顿。结论存在起搏器导线的情况下,如无重度血管狭窄,DSA 下置入带涤纶套透析导管成功率高、安全可行,两者共存短期内未见起搏器导线感染及起搏器功能不良,很少出现症状性静脉高压征。

关键词: 血液透析, 起搏器导线, 带涤纶套透析导管, 症状性静脉高压征, 导管相关性感染

Abstract:

【Abstract】Objective To explore the feasibility of implanting tunneled cuffed catheter (TCC) through internal jugular vein in the presence of heart pacemaker leads and the co-existence of catheters and leads. Methods Seventeen patients with pacemaker leads were recruited from the Department of Nephrology, Beijing Haidian Hospital from April 2014 to August 2018. TCCs were implanted under digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for these patients. The position of pacemaker electrode and leads and the function of pacemaker were examined during and after the operation. The infection around catheter and pacemaker lead, the symptomatic venous hypertension, and the ease of catheter removal were observed during the follow- up period. Results In the 17 patients, the tips of the catheters were successfully placed in the upper-middle part of right atrium in 15 patients, the catheter was implanted after balloon dilatation of the superior vena cava stenosis in one patient, and the catheter tip was first bumped the pacemaker wire and then arrived to upper-middle part of right atrium after adjustment of the tip direction in one patient. During and after the operation, the pacemaker electrodes and leads were not displaced and the functions of the pacemakers were normal. There were no pacemaker lead infection and pacemaker dysfunction during the follow-up period. One patient developed catheterrelated infection after the catheterization for one year but without infection of the pacemaker leads; the infection was cured after anti- infective therapy and replacement of the catheter. Mild swelling of upper limb occurred in one case, but no clinical intervention was required. The catheters were replaced in situ in 9 cases, and no catheter got stuck during removal of the original catheters. Conclusions In patients with pacemaker leads but without severe vascular stenosis, the implanting of TCC under DSA was highly successful and safe. The coexistence of catheters and pacemaker leads did not cause infection around pacemaker lead and pacemaker dysfunction at least in a short follow-up period. Symptomatic venous hypertension was rare.

Key words: Hemodialysis, Pacemaker lead, Tunnel-cuffed catheter, Symptomatic venous hypertension, Catheter-related infection

中图分类号: